Am I A Google Reader Over-Sharer? Are You?

Sarah Perez on November 19th, 2008

greader I’ve been taking a closer look at my Google Reader feeds lately, and, as always, I’m trying to stem the tide so the signal can rise above the noise. I’ve done a little spring cleaning, which for me doesn’t mean unsubscribing – I’m always hesitant to do that – but instead, I’ve been re-categorizing.

Is that feed really a “Can’t Miss” read? Shouldn’t that blogger be on my B-List? Doesn’t this feed belong in my “Ideas” folder?

One of the things that made the most difference was the addition of a brand-new folder I’m calling “noisy tech news.” This is now the home to any feed that drives me batty with zillions of posts per day yet doesn’t really provide that much signal. Why keep these feeds you may wonder? Well, for one thing, it’s great to have them in there for searches.

I’ve also put the aggregate feeds in here for sites like CNET and other producers of mass amounts of content. It’s not to say that CNET doesn’t have signal, but when you subscribe to a bunch of their feeds, you’re likely to see duplicate items and a lot of stuff that’s not relevant to you. However, other CNET favs, like Caroline McCarthy’s The Social for example, went elsewhere so I don’t miss them.

Although information devourer  Louis Gray might cringe at the thought, I can now happily mark this folder as read after a quick scan of headlines without feeling like I’ve missed too much.

Over-Sharers, I’m Looking At You

 

Now that I’ve gotten my subscriptions under control (ahem, for now), I’m turning my eye to the one area that’s still a bit out of control: you guys. You know know who you are. I mean, I thought I was bad (am I?) with my sharing of maybe 20-30 items per day in Google Reader, but some of you are sharing double that, triple even! Seriously, hundreds of shares. Daily! And all at once! What’s the deal? Now, I know I could just hide those over-sharers using the Google Reader “Hide” button, but the thing is, some of that stuff is actually very good. I don’t want to miss it. But then again, some of it…well, I could do without.

I’m torn. 

Of course what’s share-worthy is an entirely subjective notion, which is one thing that makes the Friends feature so great. It lets interesting stories bubble up and catch my attention, even though I may not subscribe to (or want to subscribe to) the originating blogs.

But what can be done about the uber-sharing? Should I just suck it up and hit j, j, j, j (the keyboard shortcut for flying through feeds) all day long? Should I start scanning headlines here too? Should I gasp hide the noisiest folks from sight?

Does anyone else have this problem? Suggestions welcome. 

Add to Mixx!
Follow the conversation at YackTrack!
  • November 19, 2008 at 1:32 pm Kol "Killer" Tregaskes
    Probably. :-)
  • November 19, 2008 at 1:32 pm Shevonne
    I am
  • November 19, 2008 at 1:34 pm Damien Franco
    I actually don't think that I share enough. Now, it's time for sharing!
  • November 19, 2008 at 1:39 pm Sarah Perez
    shared a few things since I wrote this post...ah, I am one! whoops!
  • November 19, 2008 at 1:41 pm Roberto Bonini
    I am.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:24 pm Ontario Emperor
    I shared this. :)
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:31 pm Aaron Krug
    Guilty as charged
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:34 pm Robert Scoble
    I didn't share this in Google Reader, but clicked like in FriendFeed. That said, I love Google Reader's sharing feature. Please use the "share with note" feature and you'll see that it gives you some extra "oomph" when your item gets here to FriendFeed.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:35 pm FFing Enigma (aka Tina)
    I use "share with note" for items that don't have an image on the original page. Anything with an image I try to share using the bookmarklet as it tends to garner more interest.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:39 pm Jordan Hofker
    Me too, Tina. I just wish it didn't take so much extra work to do that.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:40 pm Robert Scoble
    I've actually slowed WAY down on Google Reader sharing since FriendFeed came out. Here's my latest stats: "From your 820 subscriptions, over the last 30 days you read 9,965 items, starred 0 items, shared 376 items, and emailed 0 items."
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:42 pm April "The Mangler" Russo
    I have been feeling as if I shouldn't be sharing anything from any popular blogs, due to the fact that everyone has probably read it or even shared it themselves. I am thinking of only sharing stuff from blogs you might not know about, from now on.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:47 pm Daniel J. Pritchett
    I cut those feeds out and put them into a FF list I called "3) The Flood". Now RWW/TC/Mashable/Profy and a few others are no longer in my Reader. I still get their content but now I can see the other blogs that update less than 10x a day.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:47 pm Daniel J. Pritchett
    Oh and +1 Robert on "share with note". All of my gReader shares are done with FF in mind.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:48 pm tehTwo Fists
    From G-Reader an Reddit, I share everything that I find worth reading. If you've read it, skip it. If not, read it. Share is my way of saying "this is what people need to know", not "you don't know this and I'm cooler than you" mainly cause I'm not cooler than you.
  • November 19, 2008 at 2:53 pm Daniel Miessler
    Robert, what you think about this idea for aggregating content? http://bit.ly/16keB
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:00 pm Robert Scoble
    Daniel, maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but FriendFeed already does that. THere's a HUGE difference between my feed at http://www.friendfeed.com/scobleizer for instance and my "Likes and Comments" feed at http://friendfeed.com/scobleizer/discussion
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:00 pm Sean McBride
    We need to develop a different attitude to sharing, liking, marking, etc. The point of the exercise should be to collect a set of data points and build a profile over time that can be matched with other sets of data points and profiles from other people any time in the future. Less emphasis should be placed on whether people read your shared, liked or marked items at the moment. Your entire data set will become more valuable over time, and its real value may be unlocked years later in unforeseen ways. I share, like and mark items because they interest me, not because I am concerned that an audience might be interested in them. They comprise elements of a personal notebook.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:05 pm nicefishfilms
    @ Sean - exactly.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:07 pm Daniel J. Pritchett
    @Robert: I created imaginary friends for the RSS feeds of some high-volume blogs and put them on a list for me to follow. This way I just peek my head in now and then to see what's going on. This completely separate from the existing FF accounts of e.g. RWW or TechCrunch. The point for me is keeping my gReader queue manageable. I can't and won't read every single article by a newspaper-style group blog, even if I like the blog.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:09 pm Daniel J. Pritchett
    @Sean: If I can't get anyone to "like" my content on FriendFeed then the presentation is probably too poor to even get them to read it. I shape my feed in order to reliably communicate the messages I'm trying to get out. If I post a link without explanation and no one reads it, who benefits?
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:11 pm Daniel Miessler
    @Robert, the problem is that when you share something from Google Reader or FriendFeed you didn't CREATE that content--you discovered it. So it's actually more similar to your liked feed. I'm suggesting we need to completely separate them based on content you CREATE, e.g. your blog posts and comments, vs. things you discover/like.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:13 pm Daniel J. Pritchett
    @Daniel M: Identifying and re-sharing a good thought via gReader is only slightly less difficult than doing the same thing in essay form on your own blog. Both add tremendous value.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:14 pm Robert Scoble
    Daniel: actually FriendFeed puts Google Shares onto my "created" feed. But if I like things here, that goes on a separate feed. I wish I could build a single mashup of everything I do.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:17 pm Glenn Batuyong
    I can tend to over-share, I wish there was a way to make comprehensive but not overwhelming batch updates from these shares
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:19 pm Daniel J. Pritchett
    @Robert: You could create a Yahoo Pipe to merge your separate friendfeed tabs into a single RSS feed.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:19 pm FFing Enigma (aka Tina)
    Robert: Yahoo Pipes = complete mashup EDIT: Daniel, get out of my head!
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:20 pm Daniel Miessler
    @Daniel P. -- I disagree. Hitting the "Google Note" or "FF Share" button on a page is infinitely easier than 1) going into your blog software, and 2) creating something valuable in terms of extending the content via comment. When you do the former you discovered it, and when you do the later you created something. I'm proposing the idea that this distinction is important to readers. Thoughts?
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:24 pm Daniel J. Pritchett
    @Daniel M: Writing your own long-form blog post is certainly *more work* than generating a pile of FF shares with notes added. They're both extremely useful! If you want to differentiate between "first party content" and "third party content with notes added" I'm not going to stand in your way.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:24 pm Daniel Miessler
    @Robert: The single mashup is the idea. Well, two mashups--one for created and one for discovered. This kind of thing is easily accomplished with Yahoo! Pipes. I'm making my own aggregated CREATED feed very soon, and I'm going to start displaying my created and discovered content separately on my site. Twitter, Blog, Forums, Comments, etc. go to CREATED, and all the "like/vote up/share" items will go to my DISCOVERED feed. Mull it over. I think you'll see the power when it hits you.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:36 pm (jeff)isageek
    I actually dont subscribe to any feeds I just have my shared feeds of friends that I share with the rest of the world.
  • November 19, 2008 at 3:36 pm (jeff)isageek
    sharing is caring! :)
  • November 19, 2008 at 7:15 pm Shawn McCollum
    I think some of the over sharing issue could be limited by the reader. I've been coding my own reader and designed it to ignore duplicate links. Since I subscribe to louis gray's blog any items from my shared feeds do not get in my reader since they are duplicates. I don't see why in other readers they can't auto mark read duplicate links from shared feeds.